this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
914 points (99.0% liked)

The Trump-Epstein Files

965 readers
198 users here now

We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.

Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post

Our Rules

(Subject to Change)

Our Justice System

This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People still defend him lying under oath because "just a blowjob"

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The perjury charge was a stretch due to a perjury trap set up be the Republicans, which is why 10 Republicans in the Senate rejected it along with the Dems.

However, the blowjob was the bigger issue. It's unethical for a retail manager to get a blowjob from a floor associate because consent is more complicatedwhen there's a power imbalance. I don't understand how people can defend the President of the United States getting oral sex from an intern.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not really, it's just it turned out that while we're focusing on him getting a blowjob from a consenting adult almost 30 years ago, we don't focus on politician that are currently in power, and which were and are doing heinous shit to literal children. Priorities, you know.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump was impeached twice in his first term and if the Democrats gain a majority this year I'm sure he'll be impeached again. Turns if you let one party get a stranglehold on all 3 branches the whole checks and balances thing kind of falls apart.

Maybe if Clinton had been held accountable back then it would be easier to hold the president accountable now. Precedent and all that.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, because current administration fucking loves precedents and upholding a law. They literally gave the president absolute immunity, the fuck a precedent about a democrat from 30 years ago will do

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Give a significant amount of people a reminder that the president is accountable to the law, thereby changing the culture that Trump was elected into.

No president has ever been thrown out of office. No president has ever been jailed. If you think it wouldn't be at least a little bit easier for a country that had done that to do it again, you're dumb.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you fucking insane? You watch how the current clique shits on the constitutions, invents rules out of nothing, governs by bullying, speedruns autocracy with basically an approval from most of the country, and you think something will change if a president was thrown out of the office 30 years ago? You think all that inert mass, who does nothing when autocrat's personal army executes people on the street, will react somehow different if only we'd jail an already unpopular president three decades ago? What a braindead take, it's unreal.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if only we'd jail an already unpopular president three decades ago

Clinton was incredibly popular. So popular that people still defend him today. You're clearly too young to remember that era and are pulling this nonsense directly out of your ass.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now. Both clintons are wildly unpopular and irrelevant now. It's now we're talking about. Ask the nurse to give you your medicine, you're spacing out

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

idc what you think. Go play Roblox you fetus.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course you don't. Your life would be so much better and you will be so much less insufferable if you did care every once in a while

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

P narcissistic to believe that listening to you of all people would improve my life somehow

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't think that if you learned a therapy word it makes you smart all of the sudden. It only shows that you need to listen to other people more.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I listen to plenty of people. Children who soapbox about things they don't know anything about it are not on that list.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Evidence show the opposite. You might think you listen to plenty of people, but there is no way to tell which of those people are real and which are the symptoms of growing dementia. And not of an early onset variety.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How about both at the same time?

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

"Public" can't focus on both at the same time. There is rarely enough attention to focus on one issue, asking for two is just asking for none.