this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
914 points (99.0% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files
965 readers
82 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They really believe that the public will believes their excuses
About 1/3 will believe whatever they're told as long as that person shows they're on the "right" team first.
another 1/3 will believe what they see online as long as it is repeated confidently and by enough people. A couple studies show this pretty well. The best way to change that 1/3 of peoples opinions who are not die hards is to show that you're strong by being unmovable and by reading the same opinion over and over and over again. It rewires the brain.
Which is good because the left has a very strong presence on social media and they actively contest this government by challenge it in the space that the government puts all it's eggs in. Because if your enemy is putting all this effort into an area, it would be dumb to let them set up in that area. You'd have to be dumb as shit to just concede that area because it's "too hard to deal with"
People still defend him lying under oath because "just a blowjob"
The perjury charge was a stretch due to a perjury trap set up be the Republicans, which is why 10 Republicans in the Senate rejected it along with the Dems.
However, the blowjob was the bigger issue. It's unethical for a retail manager to get a blowjob from a floor associate because consent is more complicatedwhen there's a power imbalance. I don't understand how people can defend the President of the United States getting oral sex from an intern.
Not really, it's just it turned out that while we're focusing on him getting a blowjob from a consenting adult almost 30 years ago, we don't focus on politician that are currently in power, and which were and are doing heinous shit to literal children. Priorities, you know.
Trump was impeached twice in his first term and if the Democrats gain a majority this year I'm sure he'll be impeached again. Turns if you let one party get a stranglehold on all 3 branches the whole checks and balances thing kind of falls apart.
Maybe if Clinton had been held accountable back then it would be easier to hold the president accountable now. Precedent and all that.
Yeah, because current administration fucking loves precedents and upholding a law. They literally gave the president absolute immunity, the fuck a precedent about a democrat from 30 years ago will do
Give a significant amount of people a reminder that the president is accountable to the law, thereby changing the culture that Trump was elected into.
No president has ever been thrown out of office. No president has ever been jailed. If you think it wouldn't be at least a little bit easier for a country that had done that to do it again, you're dumb.
Are you fucking insane? You watch how the current clique shits on the constitutions, invents rules out of nothing, governs by bullying, speedruns autocracy with basically an approval from most of the country, and you think something will change if a president was thrown out of the office 30 years ago? You think all that inert mass, who does nothing when autocrat's personal army executes people on the street, will react somehow different if only we'd jail an already unpopular president three decades ago? What a braindead take, it's unreal.
Clinton was incredibly popular. So popular that people still defend him today. You're clearly too young to remember that era and are pulling this nonsense directly out of your ass.
Now. Both clintons are wildly unpopular and irrelevant now. It's now we're talking about. Ask the nurse to give you your medicine, you're spacing out
idc what you think. Go play Roblox you fetus.
Of course you don't. Your life would be so much better and you will be so much less insufferable if you did care every once in a while
P narcissistic to believe that listening to you of all people would improve my life somehow
Don't think that if you learned a therapy word it makes you smart all of the sudden. It only shows that you need to listen to other people more.
I listen to plenty of people. Children who soapbox about things they don't know anything about it are not on that list.
Evidence show the opposite. You might think you listen to plenty of people, but there is no way to tell which of those people are real and which are the symptoms of growing dementia. And not of an early onset variety.
How about both at the same time?
"Public" can't focus on both at the same time. There is rarely enough attention to focus on one issue, asking for two is just asking for none.