this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
233 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28826 readers
2318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Grand Juries are mentioned in the Constitution, but back then, they were a protection against just this kind of prosecution. A safeguard.

Since then, they've basically changed the definition of what a grand jury is, turning it from a check on the prosecution into a tool of it. As the saying goes, for our generations they can indict a ham sandwhich.

This administration is just so ham handed they have failed to even do that. They are too arrogant to try and craft a believable case, too arrogant to wait until they find a plausible case. Just like their lies. Their allies pretend to believe them, like their lies justifying the summary executions of Alex Pretti and Renee Good. So they don't try, believing everyone is corrupt as them and their sycophants.

But because of the Magna Carta, and English Common Law, and the Constitution that was borne from them, we have these jury trials, and grand juries, whatever bastard remains of the latter, and citizens, not handpicked sycophants in the legal system, decide guilt or innocence.

And while our politicians, courts, prosecutors, et al, are corrupt, and by and large think the republic is dead already, most of the citizenry doesn't.

Here in this country, the UK cancelled jury trials by the way, for up to 3 years in prison, up from 1 year exemption in 2020. They underfunded, sabotaged the courts to jamn them up then used he backlog as an excuse to cancel the magna carta and allow their handpicked magistrates to decide guilt. It moves things along so much quicker when you cancel the time honored freedoms of the west I suppose.

There is a push to pervert our rights across the west right now, not just in the UK and the US. We in the US despite having the perhaps worst politicians by character, also have one of the strongest systems of rights and checks and balances, in law if not in fact. We just have to find a way to get them to be honored.