this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23218 readers
243 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Considering all the recent attention surrounding Noam Chomsky and his connections to Jeffery Epstein, I thought I might ask this question.

I personally think Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a good book and makes a lot of good points regarding the bourgeois media which few other left-wing authors have made, at least not in such a concise and easily-explained way. When I shared this book with new leftists, they seem to appreciate and comprehend its contents rather quickly. The only part which I found myself majorly disagreeing with was the conclusion in which Chomsky suggests that "American democracy" is "under threat," as opposed to being non-existent in the first place.

With that being said, I consider Chomsky's work to be a pearl in an ocean of bad takes. I think that Chomsky, particularly recently, is an anti-communist propagandist and apologist for the bourgeois system, basically a left-liberal.

Is my take incorrect?

Edit: I failed to mention how this book was co-authored by someone else who is not on the Epstein files. Thank you to all those who mentioned that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Богданова@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is this book really relevant today? I'm sure there's concepts from it that are, but I don't see what solutions it offers to the reader nor does it seem like an exceptionally good piece of literature that's a must read.

There's many questionable figures that I can draw useful lessons from. The problem is a lot of them are open ended and don't actually answer the underlying problems. It's easy to fall into false consciousness with such works.

It's important to ask why is this book important and what does it solve? What does it inspire the reader to do? The Conclusion of the book is like you said. Promote "freedom and democracy" in America and across the globe. The reader can easily start thinking that all countries are bad, that all of them manufacture consent, without freedom and democracy.

Do we really need that?

[–] Wisconcom@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, we do not need that. There is a reason why the book achieved a wide range of popularity among non-socialist figures as it very much panders to them.

[–] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

popularity among non-socialist figures

It says a LOT about that thing, when leftist/socialist media/personalities/literature/theory becomes popular in such circles.