this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
68 points (94.7% liked)
Open Source
44457 readers
111 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you have to use a third party app to sync, it's not local-first, it's just local.
Local-first means your data lives on your device as the source of truth, not on someone else's server. How you choose to sync it - if at all, is up to you. That's the point.
nope... that's just local.
in that regard every text editor or any software that just CRUDs files locally would be local-first and the term would be meaningless
local-first means that it does not need internet-access to work and use the app and synchronization comes later, when there's time and internet access. please read up on this.
https://www.inkandswitch.com/essay/local-first/
these are the guys who coined the term
edit: i originally wrote "local-first means that it does need internet-access to work and use the app...", which is bullshit and also doesn't make sense in the context. i added the "not" so it is clear.
You might be right. I will re-think this :)