Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure a prompt loop sufficiently grants LLM what I would consider "agency" when the relevant discussion is about whether an LLM has agency in the way humans do (i.e. human-like intelligence, a mind, personhood, etc.).
telling me to look at beginner resources on AI isn't a helpful response when I've asked how to have better explained to OP that "AI" isn't a human-like intelligence, it ignores my question and then puts me down by implying I don't have the first clue what I'm talking about.
Your tone is rude and unhelpful, I'm done talking to you. 🫤
If your goal is really to help correct misinformation (and not just to put people down), you might need to adjust how you approach conversation with others in the future.
Huh? I don't use OpenClaw.
Well, it does allows the LLM to continuously gather information, make plans and decisions, and perform real-world actions, on its own.
I think you should provide your definition of "agency", because your definition must be very different from everyone else.
Is proven wrong -> "I'm done talking to you" 😂 someone wasn't as happy to be wrong as they claimed
Well you tried, but actually I'm still correct.
Yeah, if your argument is really "OpenClaw is not agentic AI", here you go: 🤡
And the funniest part is that yes, OpenClaw of course begins to act on its own when you spin it up, without any user prompting... you thought you had me there 😂
Perhaps you should have a basic understanding about what you are commenting on, before you comment? Especially if you're going to make personal attacks over it. Those really backfired on you now lol