Linux

12388 readers

576 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

KDE Responds to FUD Over Alleged systemd Mandate (linuxiac.com)

submitted 3 days ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/linux@programming.dev

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here’s something that’s both surprising and, in a way, not surprising at all, especially after yesterday’s announcement from KaOS, a distribution long known for its deep commitment to the KDE Plasma desktop, that it plans to move away from it. The main reason cited was KDE’s reliance on systemd in a specific component.

As expected, the news quickly gained traction, prompting KDE to clarify its dependence on systemd and which parts of the desktop environment rely on it. In a post on KDE’s Reddit community titled “A quick anti-FUD FAQ to debunk ‘the KDE is forcing systemd!’ hoax“, the contributor described the claims as misinformation and provided a short FAQ clarifying the project’s position.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like how the "FAQ" answers questions nobody was asking and accuses opponents of truth, freedom, and systemd of "decontextualising comments on merge requests" without mentioning what was actually said by whom in those merge requests so we could judge for ourselves. As a PR move to put out the flame war (which itself does seem really pointless) it seems counterproductive. But it looks like it's just another reddit post, not an official KDE policy statement or anything.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

opponents of truth, freedom, and systemd

Do you get paid by the Systemd Hate Club™ for your efforts? Are you full-time, or just a freelance clown?