347
The DOJ Quietly Deleted 892 Epstein Documents. We Built a System to Prove It.
(epsteinexposed.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
347 points (99.7% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1131 readers
23 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Created an alt just to post this. I'm terrified of saying this. I don't even know where to say this besides here. I know one of the people behind epsteinexposed (rodrigopolo). He's the last person that should be working on anything Epstein. Please don't get me wrong. Maybe epsteinexposed is a clean project and this man is infiltrating them. I don't have the capacity to analyze the project in its entirety. I do know that Rodrigo Polo is not to be trusted with calculating epsteinexposed's hashes. He's 100% MAGA and designs conspiracy theories. Want evidence? Check his content online. He has built a following spreading conspiracy theories about anyone who threatens the 1%. If you believe in epsteinexposed, care to contact their admin regarding this? I tried doing it myself but there's no way of contacting them anonymously.
The lack of any links here does not help your case. I don't know this guy and I'm not on social media. Where exactly would I look to "check his content online"?
If what you say is true, then you've obviously done this yourself, so it should be as easy as checking your browser history to find supporting links.
This probably goes without saying, but the files themselves are a conspiracy theorist's wildest dreams come true, so what you call "infiltrating" could just as easily be called "man finds his tribe," lol.
Generally speaking, math doesn't lie. If he posts his hash conclusions and how he arrived at them, others will be able to replicate that, even help him do it.
I neither believe nor disbelieve. I'm waiting to see some independently corroboratable evidence that I can look at myself.
So link your evidence. Something, anything. Otherwise it's just a call to brigade.
EDITED TO ADD that there is no "Rodrigo Polo" in the EpsteinExposed investigator list,.
Also, at the very bottom of every page on the site, this project has multiple links for contact via Facebook, X, and a discussion forum, all of which are places where you could ask them to reach out privately to you.
In addition, the project About page has a private contact form at the bottom. You could reach out there as well and get a reply via email, assuming they find you credible.
Wtf is even happening? Is that guy a hallucinating LLM? I wouldn't be surprised if there was an astroturfing thing going on to vague post and try to discredit Epstein investigators across the internet. That's the type of shit 4chan used to do, which we now know was backed by Epstein himself lol
That's what hit me as well: an effort to discredit or even brigade based on nothing but emotive language and feigned helplessness that all boil down to "trust me bro."
But this is the singularly wrong community to come at with "just take my word for it," lol.
The other thing that got my attention was that this six hour old (at the time) account's one post in this community was 1) upvoted ten times in a relatively brief period for what is nothing more than a trust me bro plea to empathy, and 2) it was from lemmy.org, where other vote manipulation activities have recently found a home.
But: thanks to you and many others, we exposed them and learned something useful.
To add to the story, a few people reported this who don’t post in this community and said they regretted posting this, but that they lost access to their account. One even sent a DM.
I decided to leave it up because I feel this community took care of it, and it serves as an educational reminder that we will be attacked. Thanks for making this community better @ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world, glad to have you with us (:
Thanks for the shoutout, it means a lot. This is a subject near and dear to me. Always happy to help. I didn't expect you to remove it because it did not specifically break any rules, but. . . it is what it is.
And as long as I have your attention, keep an eye on what comes out of lemmy. org: almost immediately after that list of lemmy. org users I linked to above (all created on the same day, btw) got exposed as participants in vote manipulation, lemmy. org stopped federating vote information, maybe even the same day. So now whenever you try to use lemvotes.org to get info on any comment, post, or user made through lemmy. org it 404's out unless it's historical and prior to that defederation of vote info.
There's one lone admin over there, and he seems to have a side business in "Display & Video Monetization Solutions" which, nothing against that when it's aboveboard, but artificial hype is very much a part of that game in general.
So to me, given all this info taken together, when something comes across the comm that's fishy, also coming from lemmy. org is a solid strike against. It's not a crime in itself, of course, just something for you to be aware of when evaluating a questionable post or comment.
Noted
Spreading suspicion and offering no links to said "online conten" t is sus AF, bro.