106
"We may hate the Fr*nch, but they do have a great system for removing 'heads' of state..."
(media.piefed.social)
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
106 points (100.0% liked)
History Memes
2007 readers
956 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
-
History referenced must be 20+ years old.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Explanation: During the US Civil War, the pro-slavery Confederacy repeatedly attempted to get European countries, like Britain and France, to recognize and support them. For a brief period of time, the British government even considered intervening in the war - getting one over on the Americans and getting cheap cotton? What's not to love?
... but the British public, including the electorate, was staunchly abolitionist by this time, and abhorred the thought of supporting a rebellion to prolong slavery in any way, shape, or form. For this reason, the British government had to tread lightly with its 'foreign policy interests', lest the next election be a massacre, leaving the Confederacy isolated and alone until its ignominious and much-deserved death four years later.
It's worth noting the British PM at the time was also staunchly abolitionist, he just really hated America.
Based.
Living rent free since 1776 lmao
It's also a big reason that Lincoln issued the emancipation proclamation. It forced the optics of anyone helping the south to appear as pro slavery.
...because the traitor states' own declarations of secession didn't make that clear enough, somehow.
tbf, one side being pro-slavery doesn't make the other anti-slavery - making the Union nominally anti-slavery was a huge PR boost, even if it was initially controversial amongst voters. And it's a lot harder to go against an anti-slavery polity fighting a pro-slavery polity, than a pro-slavery polity against a more pro-slavery polity.
People have never and never will read the docs.