this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
641 points (99.8% liked)

World News

53977 readers
3179 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary
Police say King Charles's brother is in custody and officers are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk - read the police statement in full

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

He's being arrested for sharing official documents. Not the disgusting crimes he committed against children and/or women. It's not real accountability, it's theater meant to placate the angry masses.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 38 minutes ago

It's likely all they have sufficient evidence to charge him with in their jurisdiction.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I read some analysis on this in the guardian, it predicted this would happen, because the police have limited resources and can only follow up one of the two charges. This charge is chosen because there is far more likely to be incontrovertible evidence, probably in the form of paper trails etc. Whereas proving he raped children decades ago relies on witness testimony, which is far easier for his very expensive (taxpayer-funded, mind) lawyers to talk down in court.
If this cunt sees a single day in prison I call that a win.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Trump had crates full of official documents in his bathroom and nobody touched him in four years.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

theater meant to placate the angry masses

Thousands of years into our civilization and the oldest tricks still work the best. The more things change and all that.

edit: that said, Epstein was almost definitely working as a double-agent between various organizations, maybe a quadruple agent or more, he wasn't so well-connected and powerful just because he dealt children, he also dealt secrets between superpowers, so just having contact with him as a state official puts a massive spotlight on you as a security risk.

National governments care a lot more about you being a security risk than they do about you hurting kids.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The penalty is mostly fines. Even sharing military secrets in UK is only 2 years. WTF Brits.

[–] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

OTOH - consider the plight of Manning and Snowden. Perhaps a penalty of 2 years would encourage whistleblowers?