this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
42 points (85.0% liked)

Bay Area

1520 readers
95 users here now

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34367979

More barriers to cycling means more cars which means more dead cyclists/pedestrians. Help us defeat this terrible anti-safety bill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I meant motorised bikes in the same speed range as ebikes. Mopeds, not motorbikes. You need a licence, insurance, tag for them. Why not for an equally fast (and dangerous) ebike/pedelec?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

F = m * a

Mopeds are at minimum 2-3 times heavier than electric bikes, making them 2-3 times more dangerous since they have 2-3 times more force, without taking speed into account at all. Taking speed into consideration, class 1 and 2 e-bikes top out at 20 mph, while a 50cc moped (based on some preliminary searching, someone please correct me here) tops out at 30 mph, multiplying the force by 1.5x in comparison.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Tell that to the people run over or nearly hit by reckless ebike riders in the pedestrian shopping zone.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

For velocity you want kinetic energy .5(mass*V^2)

That’s why braking distance scales exponentially with velocity. 30 vs 20 mph is over twice the energy at the same mass.