this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
592 points (99.2% liked)

Actually Infuriating

898 readers
596 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm all for govt enforcing science. Science isn't "how you raise your kids". It's not subjective. It's science since it's fact.

To your point about RFK - think about the analogy of law. We have / had a society where law was relatively objective and was enforced to an extent. That wasn't govt overreach - it was govt doing its job.

But it is unavoidable that a corrupt govt will ignore the law and do illegal things. Same with science - they can already send masked agents to invade your house without a warrant. They can also tell doctors to stop using vaccines.

The only thing we can do in these situations where a fascist is in power is have people resist and ignore them. Doctors will continue to administer vaccines as long as they can.

I think we still need to make it as hard as possible to legitimize this corruption, though. Science-based laws should go through a large approval process first, just like any important law.

Also, doesn't the govt already enforce school curriculums to an extent?