this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
760 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38093 readers
3445 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You literally just contradicted yourself in two sentences.

You claim you don't support inhumane practices, but then you call it "unnecessary drivel" when someone speaks out against them? And then you try to normalize those inhumane practices as simply "perfectly well accepted terms"?

They're not just words, those words have meanings, and the meaning of this one is atrocious.

[–] Chicxulub@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Ok, but no one said anything about declawing their cat. No one suggested that declawing cats wasn't harmful to them. What exactly is the point of getting pissy with someone for using the correct term for a thing?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

If it's a euphemism then it's not the correct term; mutilation is correct.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

It is the currently used term, perhaps but it’s certainly not the correct one.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The top-level comment literally said "because the cat isn't declawed" not "because cats have claws."

It subtly insinuates that cats being declawed is the norm and that cats with claws are a deviation from that norm, when the reality is that cats with claws are the norm and that cats being declawed is the deviation. Not only that, but it's also harmful and atrocious to force that deviation upon them.

The top-level comment was an attempt to normalize the mutilation of pets, and the next person's response was completely appropriate and called for.

[–] Chicxulub@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It subtly insinuates that cats being declawed is the norm and that cats with claws are a deviation from that norm

No, it doesn't. Declawing was a common thing to do and it's still legal in most places. It's not that unusual to find rescue cats that have been declawed.

it’s also harmful and atrocious to force that deviation upon them.

Yes, for the 10th time in this thread, literally no one here has suggested otherwise.

The top-level comment was an attempt to normalize the mutilation of pets

Not it's not, it was an observation of the absence of a still relatively commonly seen occurrence. If they really cared cats, then a simple correction would have sufficed, rather than bringing attention to themselves with passive aggressive shittiness.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Declawing was a common thing to do and it's still legal in most places.

Exactly, all the more reason to call it out when you see language that normalizes it.

literally no one here has suggested otherwise.

If you agree that it's bad, then get with the effing program instead of focusing your ire on the people who are actually calling it out!

it was an observation of the absence of a still relatively commonly seen occurrence.

Again, a sane person would say "cats have claws," not "that cat hasn't been declawed." See the difference?

If they really cared cats, then a simple correction would have sufficed

Oh, you want to question whether someone really cares about cats? Someone who actually called out language that was attempting to normalize declawing, while you're the one rushing to defend that language? I don't think so.

rather than bringing attention to themselves with passive aggressive shittiness

You're the one doing that by arguing on the same side as the rhe people saying things like "do you go around looking for reasons to be offended" and "some people make impotent rage their identity."