this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
64 points (88.1% liked)

Programming

25740 readers
377 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI-generated code is shipping to production without security review. The tools that generate the code don't audit it. The developers using the tools often lack the security knowledge to catch what the models miss. This is a growing blind spot in the software supply chain.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The article says:

None of the tools produced exploitable SQL injection or cross-site scripting

but I've seen exactly this. After years of not seeing any SQL injection vulnerabilities (due to the large increase in ORM usage plus the fact that pretty much every query library supports/uses prepared statements now), I caught one while reviewing vibe-coded code ~~written~~ generated by someone else.

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forget SQL injection and XSS, LLMs are bringing back unsanitised inputs as a whole, including reintroducing previously removed vulnerabilities. You can casually browse Github for submissions by Claude bot and find ../.. vulns all over.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes. And let's not forget bringing back the classic "forgot to even put a password on the sensitive files".

[–] ugo@feddit.it 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

vibe-coded code written by someone else

“Someone else” “writes” vibe-coded code in the same way that someone buying a meal at a restaurant cooks said meal.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 1 day ago

Haha good point - maybe "generated by" is a better description?