this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
108 points (94.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46750 readers
698 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For lack of a better term? I'm not sure what to call it. I started arguing with someone who was claiming you shouldn't help people in public because it could get you into legal trouble. Without wanting to even get into the ethics of why you should help someone regardless, I brought up good Samaritan laws. This person brought up a guy in Illinois who was convicted as a sex offender for grabbing a girl by the arm and lecturing her for jumping in front of a car without looking both ways first. According to this person, holding someone underage, even for a moment, counts as imprisonment of a minor, and automatically gets you put on the sex offender registry for life.

Now, that seemed fishy, but plausible in an awful sort of way, so I did some digging. I found several sources that mentioned this story, and learned the alleged man's name is Fitzroy Barnaby, the incident occurred in 2001, he was convicted in Cook County in 2003, and it's a cautionary tale against being a good Samaritan (ugh). But I cannot find any court documents, nor can I find any original sources. Every source references a since-deleted article by the "Chicago Sun Times", and Barnaby isn't even listed on the Illinois sex offender registry. Was this whole story just made up? Or have records been sealed and scrubbed or something?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 33 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Common sense says you can't get convicted as a sex offender for grabbing someone by the arm if you had reason to believe they were in imminent danger.

These kinds of stories have been around since the dawn of time for all sorts of things. Whenever you investigate the details it turns out that either the story is completely made up, or the offense was much more serious than it sounded.

Like the woman who sued macdonalds for getting third degree burns because their coffee was too hot.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Like the woman who sued macdonalds for getting third degree burns because their coffee was too hot.

Please never mention this story without pointing out at least one of the following;

  • The coffee was hot enough to cause crippling burns to her genitals.
  • McDonald's intentionally had their coffee too hot to drink to keep customers from hanging out
  • the woman only asked for medical expenses and did not sue until her complaint was ignored.
  • the eye-popping headline number was calculated as something like one day of the company's coffee profit.

There literally isn't an instance of a US company being sued by a customer more deserving of empathy and horror.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 12 hours ago

AND McDonalds had been warned that their coffee was too dangerously hot on previous occasions, which they ignored, so it was entirely predictable, probable, and preventable.

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, the context in which they invoked the case assumed we'd all remember those details already.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

The way they worded it made it sound to me, at first, that they were saying her story was made up. Upon a rereading, I can see that that's not the case. However, the wording could be seen as a little ambiguous.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -5 points 16 hours ago

I doubt there's anyone here who is not already aware of these details.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

she had legit evidence,Her labias got fused her thigh, from the permanent burn injuries. at first when the news came to light years before the recent one, it was allegeded she was instigating it, but it wasnt the case.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

It is not an urban legend if it actually happened lol