this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

SneerClub

1240 readers
28 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Richard Ngo (rationalist circle-jerker and former employee of DeepMind and OpenAI) has finally identified the key problem that AI safety people won't address: it won't engage honestly with taboos.

More specifically, AI safety people are failing to acknowledge how much brown people suck. And if AI people can't acknowledge controversial and obvious truths such as this, what's going to happen with their LLMs?

Even Scoot, the bravest of the brave truth-tellers, is so fearful of being tarred a racist that he covers his actual beliefs about black people in jokes and irony.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From the replies:

But every man under the age of 30 that I've ever met at Lighthaven, that I've had the opportunity to speak with privately, has completely and totally integrated IQ differences into their ontology.

The entirety of Lighthaven needs locker insertion

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 7 points 21 hours ago

talking about "their ontology" like it's a mtg deck. "i'm bringing in extra racism from the sideboard"

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As in they need a locker stuffed into them? Agreed

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 5 points 20 hours ago