Funny

13962 readers

240 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

551

Watching AI companies complain that their intellectual property is not being respected will never stop being hilarious (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Also pictured here: Anthropic stating out loud their models will just give out all the "secret" and "secured" internal data to anyone who asks.

Of course, that's by design. LLMs can't have any barrier between data and instructions, so they can never be secure.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 20 points 2 days ago

Distillation is using one model to train another. It's not really about leaking data.

Claude was used to generate censorship-safe alternatives to politically sensitive queries like questions about dissidents, party leaders, or authoritarianism, likely in order to train DeepSeek’s own models to steer conversations away from censored topics

But you're right, prompt injection/jailbreaking is still trivial too.