this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
32 points (64.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46750 readers
708 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A friend and I are arguing over ghosts.

I think it’s akin to astrology, homeopathy and palm reading. He says there’s “convincing “ evidence for its existence. He also took up company time to make a meme to illustrate our relative positions. (See image)

(To be fair, I’m also on the clock right now)

What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I knew an athiest who believed in ghosts. no idea how he squared that.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I am the friend OP is referring to and I am also an atheist

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

the dude I knew was all like well evp's and im like yeah and play records backwards to hear satan. They are like well all these researches with hauntings and im like yeah and all the verified miracles the churches detectives do.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Aaah the plot thickens

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't you just need to believe in a soul? And haven't philosophers been pondering that in various ways for a long time?

I think this post on another thread nails the core of the issue for me and it's pretty independent of religion (since I think potential mechanisms could be independent of religion):

If a bunch of people were going around saying I got this weird burn on my skin after holding this rock for a while, scientists would have discovered radioactivity a lot sooner.

There are a bunch of people going around claiming to have interacted with ghosts, and we've got bupkis.

https://fedia.io/m/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world/t/3507873/-/comment/14195254

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Its wierd to me when someone does not believe in god because of no evidence but will believe in ghosts, spirits, elves, fairies, aliens, magic, etc with no evidence. To me atheism is not believing in the supernatural at all be it god or the philosphers stone.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't need to be supernatural though - just something we don't yet understand. Aliens aren't supernatural - they're just life from a different planet. It's not just lack of evidence why I don't believe in God. The whole concept collapses under scrutiny.

Aliens at least seem like something that could conceivably be real. We already know there's life in the universe. Claiming we're alone is already a kind of a crazy position in itself.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't see why the concept of god collapses under scrutiny. Sure any specific does but so does like specifically romulans existing.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, I see.

I'd argue we all believe in a thing or two that we don't have great evidence for when confronted. And I'd argue the size of the collection of things we could believe is mind bogglingly large. So then you end up with combinations like this.

But yeah, agreed from the framing in your comment that believing both is pretty logically inconsistent.

Thinking through this idea a bit more, I think there are a lot of people that would describe themselves as atheists that believe that certain things will improve their health in a way that others would describe as lacking evidence and should be included on that list. If you push on that idea then I think you'd start getting tension and pushback from a lot of atheists. I'm sure there are other categories you could do this with but I'm not thinking of others quickly now.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

I mean for myself there are things I do that can't say have rigorous scientific proof but usually have some basis and personal experience that it works for me. I mean if I found prayer effectively solved problems for myself I likely would not be athiest even if no studies showed that. I take fish oil because an eye doctor recommended it for dry eye and my personal experience is it helps but I have no study to back it up. I take a vitamin supplemented cod in particular because my doctor said I needed to get more d and that was the only way I was willing to get it. I take a diosimin supplement because when I had a bad hemmoriod it was prescribed to bring it down and I found out it was also prescribed as a profolatic at lower doses so I basically self medicated. Seems to help. When I talk about the effects of these on myself I should mention im bad at consistantly taking them and when I don't I notice stuff. I like long baths and it seems to have a variety of beneficial effects especially with sleep and stuff so its good when done to be done at night. I think I have seen studies but not things I would consider rigorous. I mean. I really don't think I have anything that does not have some basis and im pretty aware of how weak or strong the basis is of most things I do.