this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
502 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

81933 readers
2904 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.

Regardless, these threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request.

It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider. Our strong preference is to continue to serve the Department and our warfighters—with our two requested safeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the expansive terms we have proposed for as long as required.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 61 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It’s probably more they don’t wanna get blamed if AI launches missiles because the idiots in charge pressed shift+tab and yolo’d.

Claude: “You’re right. I completely committed a war crime. I’m so very sorry! How would you like to proceed?”

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Why not both? I'm pretty sure Trump wanted to hold them legally responsible for whatever their system did too

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Those two safeguards they deny to remove must be quite the thing.

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

I was listening to NPR yesterday and heard the two are apparently mass surveillance of Americans and autonomous weapons systems with no human interaction..

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Or they are just doing this for optics, with an understanding that the feds will end up forcing their hand in the future.

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Can't say I know what or why, but I was having issues this week with their desktop client. When I was viewing their status page, I saw that they have a new service for gov use that went online about 10 days ago.