this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
184 points (99.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

4219 readers
1015 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Source please? I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, just that I haven't seen that.reported.

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Will you post a correction now?

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

i mean no why would i just because you posted people can see the times and figure it out themselves

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nyctre@piefed.social 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"suspected iranian drone" and "unclear if that was the intended target" both written in that short article. Not sure if that's the gotcha you think it is.

Why can't that be an American/Russian/Israeli/whatever drone trying to stirr a war?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Because its visually and audio confirmed as a Sahed drone.

Only Russia uses and they are too far away.

Also what intended target is in a city. Those drones have a accuracy of about 3m.