this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
379 points (99.5% liked)

History Memes

2118 readers
413 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@piefed.social
Deceptichum@quokk.au
379
Party like it's 1922 (media.piefed.social)
submitted 6 days ago by PugJesus@piefed.social to c/historymemes@piefed.social
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Demanding freedom of speech doesn’t really make you an anarchist?

I wonder why they were demanding freedom of speech for, specifically, left-socialist and anarchist groups?

They must have mentioned them for no particular reason. /s

Both sides suffered casualties on par with the civil war’s deadliest battles. The American consulate at Vyborg estimated 10,000 Bolsheviks dead, wounded, or missing, including 15 Congress delegates.

  1. That number offered by the American consulate isn't backed by Soviet archives, which cites ~3,400 dead of their own.

  2. "Dead or wounded" is a much broader category than "Dead"

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wonder why they were demanding freedom of speech for, specifically, left-socialist and anarchist groups?

and...... Meaning they weren't a commune of just anarchist. Just a year before they were all congratulated by Trotsky himself for being such ardent communist. As I said in the first place they were disgruntled with the system, but that doesn't automatically make it an anarchist rebellion. No one claimed there weren't anarchist among them.... It was the early 1900s in Russia, you couldn't throw a stone without hitting an anarchist.

isn't backed by Soviet archives, which cites ~3,400 dead of their own.

Ahh yes, the soviet's.... Famous for accurately archiving their casualties......

Dead or wounded" is a much broader category than "Dead"

And this is the reason for your dramatic rebuttal, or are we just being pedantic now?

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

and…… Meaning they weren’t a commune of just anarchist. Just a year before they were all congratulated by Trotsky himself for being such ardent communist. As I said in the first place they were disgruntled with the system, but that doesn’t automatically make it an anarchist rebellion. No one claimed there weren’t anarchist among them…. It was the early 1900s in Russia, you couldn’t throw a stone without hitting an anarchist.

This you, buddy?

First of all, I don’t really know of anyone calling Konstadt rebellion to be led by anarchist. They were ardent communist who became disillusioned over time due to poor working conditions.

Ahh yes, the soviet’s…. Famous for accurately archiving their casualties……

Oh, is that where we're at? Other than the speculations of the American embassy at the time, which would not have had much access to sources beyond the talk circulating amongst mid-level Soviet officials, who were unlikely to have been exceptionally loose-lipped around the Americans, whose numbers are we relying on now?

And this is the reason for your dramatic rebuttal, or are we just being pedantic now?

"Wow, you really think it's IMPORTANT that I tripled the number of dead???"

Yes.