Countdown to a brigade of triggered tankies:
3... 2... Oh wait, this is piefed
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
379 points (99.5% liked)
History Memes
2109 readers
617 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
-
History referenced must be 20+ years old.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
Watch it, you'll summon the .ml tankies defending War Crimes
Yeah lmao I literally thought this is just calling on the .ml invasion to happen. Its only a matter of time now
I think piefed defederated with .ml
No, I think we're still federated. I'm just very 'active' as a moderator in the HistoryMemes comm banning tankie apologists here, so they probably don't see much point in it.
Oh, I see. Keep up the good work!
Here, take this badge of honor for your work: 🎖️
Its for the better tbh.
Oh I agree, it's so peaceful on these threads. I block all the .ml comms but I still have to see .ml users in other threads so I'm planning on switching to piefed
load more comments
(1 replies)
Low estimates are nine million dead and the high estimates are that he killed thirty million of his citizens.
Western propaganda! TO THE GULAGS WITH YOU.
Oh never mind Stalin was nine to thirty million dead Lenin was only four to fourteen million.
I keep confusing these mass murdering communist heads of state.
Oh, I thought you were talking about Zedong... D:
His number is forty to seventy million dead.
High score so far.
load more comments
(1 replies)
But Lenin has a fancy sarcophagus so he gets a free pass.
It's ironic that you say "sarcophagus" because the only reason Lenin was mummified was that King Tut's tomb had been discovered just before his death. Pravda had covered the discovery extensively and the Bolsheviks decided to capitalize on Tut's popularity by preserving Lenin's corpse -- in hilariously amateurish fashion, since mummification was not something regularly done in Russia.
Also, Stalin was hot when he was young, so we can fix him.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Okay Stalin was just a dipshit but most people you're counting against Lenin died in circumstances legitimately out of his control (the civil war and the famine resulting thereof). He was still a dipshit, but not a mass murdering dipshit.
I mean, I don't know how much blame I'd ascribe to Lenin, but his 'war communism' policy was very much a contributor to the famine.
I mean true but save for some weird decisions (something something bag men) that strictly goes under the war part; I can forgive the Bolsheviks for not pulling punches while fighting literal fascists, and they did address the problem as soon as they knew about it. War communism didn't need to be as brutal or as far-reaching as it was, but for the most part it was an acceptable play in a terrible situation.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
What are you referencing? Even in the most anti communist historical interpretations the vast amount of deaths are usually attributed to Stalin, not Lenin.
If we're talking about the holodomor..... That began in 1932, roughly 8 years after Lenin had already died.
I'm not claiming that there aren't any valid criticisms of the Russian revolution, however I think attributing all that criticism to Lenin is just historically inaccurate.
We also have to view history within the context of their own time when evaluating things like social morality. Was the Soviet revolution devoid of crimes against humanity, no. But I think it would be hard to argue that it wasn't a vast improvement compared to the literal tyrannical rule of the Romanov family.
Lenin is responsible for a huge amount of deaths during the revolution, during the civil war and after. This whole story of "Lenin was good and then Stalin corrupted the revolution" is actually rooted in the propaganda of Khrushchevs destalinisation. But if you read a good biography of Lenin, you will find out that was totally fine with all the political murders
Lenin is responsible for a huge amount of deaths during the revolution, during the civil war and after
I would say that the Romanov are the party who are largely responsible for the deaths during the revolution. Some kind of revolution was going to happen in Russia, and just reducing all the blame on Lenin ignores the context of the actual fractious nature of the revolution.
This whole story of "Lenin was good and then Stalin corrupted the revolution" is actually rooted in the propaganda of Khrushchevs destalinisation.
Again, I didn't say he was a nice guy. My claim was that it's straight up ahistorical to claim he murdered 9 million people.
if you read a good biography of Lenin, you will find out that was totally fine with all the political murders
What is a revolution if not a collection of political murders? Again, we have to view the revolution with context and measure them against their contemporaries. It's not as if the revolution happened to a ruling government that was unfamiliar with political murders themselves.
I would say that the Romanov are the party who are largely responsible for the deaths during the revolution. Some kind of revolution was going to happen in Russia, and just reducing all the blame on Lenin ignores the context of the actual fractious nature of the revolution.
Would you like to remind me what kind of mass violence there was between February and October in 1917
It’s not as if the revolution happened to a ruling government that was unfamiliar with political murders themselves.
Would you like to remind me what provisional government and elected legislature the Bolsheviks actually performed their revolution against?
load more comments
(8 replies)
Maybe just do not try to downplay soviet crimes? They were not nice guys, they murdered a lot ot people and we really should not discuss about how many millions were slaughtered. Lenin was not a good man.
load more comments
(15 replies)
Churchill starved 4 million Bengali to death.
And the high estimates of excessive deaths in British occupied India is 100 mil?
So because British imperialism was bad, mass death in the Soviet Union was okay?
It seems like you're learning the wrong lessons from history...
It’s that same style whataboutism that Trumpers love to do: “what about Biden?” It’s fucking annoying and I hate Joe Biden. When your only argument is pointing to what someone else did, you don’t really have an argument.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Sounds like we all agree that IMPERIALISM BAD. Glad that's been cleared up
Cool. The first one still happened.
People who think Bernie Sanders is right-wing hate this post
So piefed is like entirely anti communist?
I'm anti-bolshevik, not anti-communist.
If you think disdain for dictators who overthrow democratically elected socialist governments is anti-communist, that's a you problem, man.
Stirring up drama in leftist spaces online is not praxis
Stirring up drama in leftist spaces online is not praxis
... okay?
Where did I say it was?
Not that fascists with a coat of red paint are leftists. Nor do I go into their online spaces.
Leninism, stalinism and Maoism leads straight to fascism - historically speaking.
But communism is a destination - not a journey, damnit. Those ideologies merely suppose how you reach that destination, and as you can see they do not...
...because they lead to fascism.
A centralized committee?! A one party system?!?! No, mon signor. No bueno. That's centralization of power. It's power to the people, not some git in a suit spewing sweet nothings.
haha certain persons cof cof... ml... cof cof.. 'll have a brain bleeding
Did you mix up Lenin and Stalin? Weird to see shade thrown at Lenin, spose Marx and Engels were also mass murdering criminals?
Lenin couped a democratic socialist government, started a 4-year long civil war in the process, implemented mass imprisonment of political dissidents, suppressed workers' rights and freedoms, and attempted to wage wars of aggresion against neighboring states, including crushing the anarchists of Ukraine.
Lenin has a better reputation, and legitimately is not as bad as Stalin... but Lenin is still fucking horrible.
Admittedly a lot of my surface knowledge of the character comes from Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast and he paints a more nuanced picture of Lenin than just 'gross war criminal'. I think focusing on just his failures and crimes does a disservice to history tbh, I don't hate your meme I just think Stalin fits better.
Lenin's crimes are often ignored or justified by apologists, which is exactly why the meme is important.
view more: next ›