this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
283 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

82129 readers
3741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
283
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear dispute over copyrights for AI-generated material (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 21 hours ago by FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday ⁠to take up the issue of whether art generated by artificial intelligence can be copyrighted under U.S. law, turning away ​a case involving a computer ​scientist from Missouri who was ​denied a copyright for a piece of visual art made by his AI system.

Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed to the justices after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual ⁠art ‌at issue in the case was ineligible for copyright protection ⁠because it did not have a human creator.

Thaler, of St. Charles, Missouri, applied for a federal copyright registration in 2018 covering “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” visual art he said his AI technology “DABUS” created. The image shows train tracks entering ‌a portal, surrounded by what appears to be green and purple plant imagery.

The Copyright Office rejected his application in 2022, finding that creative works must have human authors ​to be eligible to receive a copyright. U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration had urged the Supreme Court not to hear Thaler’s appeal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how to write code myself, but intuitively it seems a little different in this case.

When it comes to photography, I can show the original unedited RAW file with full resolution and full metadata and everyone else just has a lower-resolution JPG. The same thing applies to most digital art.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Can you, though? What if you didn't save it?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is how you get a reputation as being a troll, FaceDeer

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Says the guy who follows me around and dredges through months of my Reddit history looking for vaguely relevant comments to try to play "gotcha" with.

You could just block me, you know.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, you've gotten the XLE special treatment as well. Welcome to the club.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 10 hours ago

I was wondering what I'd done to warrant this attention. It's kind of puzzling - I'm not keeping my Reddit account "secret", I link to it and mention my interests in my profile bio. But XLE has been acting like he was a sleuth cracking a case.