Asklemmy

53359 readers

273 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

What's with users of fediverse using 'Go back to reddit' as a retort to other users? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by calmblue75@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am seeing this pattern a lot lately, whenever a person disagrees strongly or expresses conservative/right wing views, they are told to go back to reddit.

You can say 'Don't bring these bullshit views to the fediverse,' or something of that sort. I am a reddit refugee myself, and part of the Reddit API exodus. Being told to go someplace I just left due to ethical reasons feels bad. So, I want to understand why it is being used as a retort. Is it really rude, or am I making a fuss out of nothing?

Edit 1: I am NOT defending conservative views, I think that they should not be given a platform in the fediverse. I am questioning how telling them to go back to reddit is a valid response.

Edit2 : Edited the the title to better represent my question.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

People disagreeing with you

That's not what OP was on about. They were talking about nazism. That's not a differing opinion, a valid stance, or something to even remotely consider. Nazis aren't "people disagreeing with you"

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You would have a point if people didn't call their opponents nazis on these forums just to get them censored.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure what you said, your last word was censored. In any case, you're off-topic. Read from the top.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No, I'm right on topic.

Saying "nazis aren't welcome" is akin to "agree with me or leave" in an environment where people call their opposition nazis just to have them censored.

This is that environment.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

It's funny watching this argument.

I'm from a very hippy community.

I'm a collectivist.

I'm extremely far left & progressive.

I'm wholly anti-fascist.

I'm also 100% in agreement with you regarding including differing opinions regardless of how extreme.

Inclusivity only brodens the divide and limits opportunities for people who harbor extremist views to be influenced toward developing more balanced, functional, and beneficial perspectives.

Moderation can be used to soften their influences in our commuty while including them allows our community to influence them.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Anecdotal story and all but I feel this encapsulates why most people support kicking Nazis out even if they seem polite to start.