this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
24 points (74.0% liked)

Asklemmy

53347 readers
444 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am seeing this pattern a lot lately, whenever a person disagrees strongly or expresses conservative/right wing views, they are told to go back to reddit.

You can say 'Don't bring these bullshit views to the fediverse,' or something of that sort. I am a reddit refugee myself, and part of the Reddit API exodus. Being told to go someplace I just left due to ethical reasons feels bad. So, I want to understand why it is being used as a retort. Is it really rude, or am I making a fuss out of nothing?

Edit 1: I am NOT defending conservative views, I think that they should not be given a platform in the fediverse. I am questioning how telling them to go back to reddit is a valid response.

Edit2 : Edited the the title to better represent my question.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Short answer? It's normally used against conservatives, but cliques and purity politics (both literal politics and not) do come into play on occasion.

Longer answer: Lemmy was originally founded by a bunch of Marxist-Leninists and socialists of similar stripes (that's what the .ml stands for), and early adopters often made up some form of minority group/outcast - LGBTQ and the like. This has led to a very zero tolerance policy towards conservative "talking points" and the usual bag of tricks that they employ when attempting to colonize an area/group. Especially as Reddit has further enshitified, but even before then Redditors were generally thought of more in terms of r/the_Donald subscribers rather than as disparate groups from across the political spectrum.

There are of course the "joined Lemmy before it was cool" groups who resent the growing popularity of the platform - especially after the Reddit API exodus that brought you and me here - but I think they're largely relegated to the parts of Lemmy that most of the instances defederated from. Some of those places are basically the leftist equivalent of 4chan, and would absolutely use it as an insult if you failed their political belief purity tests.

In short, basically everybody would use it for a Trumper, but a small few might use it on me if I were to say something like that I think that dbzer0's support of genAI inherently makes the instance pro-corporatism so long as they're the ones benefitting from stealing labor from workers, and an even smaller few would probably use it simply because I started using Lemmy during the Reddit API fiasco.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Redditors self-police their speech to fall in the window of acceptable debate. They are deeply brainwashed but have no idea of it because Reddit moderators ban anything not deemed "acceptable speech" by their media overlords. Hence they will spam the term "tankie" if someone for example tells them that killing the Iranian leader will only end up like killing Saddam in Iraq.

In the wise words of pedo-Zionist:

[–] CanadaPlus -3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Somehow, it's way easier to get banned here than over there, though.

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Remember when CTH was banned for saying “kill slave owners”?

[–] Daxelman@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Ooooh I wanna try this.

Kill Slave Owners.

Murder Slave Owner.

Absolutely turbo murder kill slave owners in real life no cap.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not if you know the forbidden Reddit terms. Try saying anything anti-Zionist on mainstream Reddit subs and you are banned in half a second by automated bots.

[–] CanadaPlus -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

That actually got me a temp ban here once, as well.

It was even a nuanced "both sides are human" take, not Hamas is awesome. I know, I wasn't expecting it for that either.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 hours ago

~~"Nuanced"~~ Both sidesing in the face of a genocide? Condemning the oppressors and oppressed in equal measure? Do you not see the issue with that?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago

not Hamas is awesome

Should have been perma

[–] CanadaPlus 5 points 13 hours ago

It's slightly less obvious than "log off".

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 14 points 17 hours ago

I've always seen that used in response to some insipid memey smuglord comeback behavior

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 51 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

"conservative/right wing" views are basically nazi views. calling this mindset "different views" is like calling child rape "different tastes"--it starts and finishes as complete bullshit. it's not a different view, it's a fucking wrong view.

people with these "different views" are in support of a corrupt pedo rapist fascist fucking con man, and we just bombed a school full of children. there is no echo chamber in support of any of that here yet, and honestly, if/when that becomes the case, i'll be going somewhere else.

also, are you a right winger, on .ml?

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I didn't mean to say that conservative views are just different views. I phrased my initial post badly, sorry. I mean to say that this retort is used also for differing views. A few days back, I was asked to go back to reddit because I questioned the US-limited view of politics. I don't think my view was conservative. I was just thinking in what situations this retort is used.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 17 points 22 hours ago

you will find juvenile trolls on whatever platform you use, especially as more and more people join. fediverse is no exception. "go back to reddit" is the new "touch grass." whatever rational explanation there may be for people lashing out probably isn't worth the effort to understand. best advice is to ignore and/or block people who are making you read this much into their ranting.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip -4 points 16 hours ago

They are simply different views. Don’t get swayed by the nuts around here. Ya just ignore their extremism and accept that genuine discourse on politics isn’t done here.

It’s great for everything else tho.

load more comments (5 replies)

They are trying make lemmy like reddit and that's why they act like buttheads.

[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 28 points 23 hours ago

I would guess that if your politics is based on selfishness, some might consider that antithetical to the idea of a fediverse.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think the Right Wing Playbook series on Youtube explains very well why we shouldn’t suffer alt-right and fascist style argument anywhere. They are not in good faith and don’t contribute anything to the marketplace of ideas.

True conservative thought has a place but that is very very rare to see anymore.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

"conservative" as a valid train of thought died with john mccain

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago

“Conservative” as a valid train of thought never existed

They’re all rich men with delusions of grandeur who want to maneuver rubes into magical thinking about holy ideals and how cooperation is evil because it’s not what nature intended, so they can rob them blind for their own gain.

[–] diverging@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

john mccain

The guy that sang Bomb bomb bomb Bomb bomb Iran?

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 3 points 16 hours ago

No, they mean the guy from Die Hard

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Your question basically amounts to "Why are people being excluded for holding exclusionary beliefs?"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Lemmy is older than the Reddit exodus, and historically had stricter moderation. When the exodus happened, the OG lemmy users saw the newcomers as rude at best, and various forms of bigots at worst. So 'go back to Reddit' is short-hand for 'such talk is not welcome here'.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, but at that point it was pretty much a ghost town. The only acceptable commentary to some people is whatever they type to themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 11 points 23 hours ago

Look at it as a semi-creative variation on the theme of "go to hell."

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Some even fight you if you share the same views here. As long as dialogue is civil and respectful everyone should be welcome to their opinion.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Dialogue is a big part. I think the thing I have noticed in the internet is the reduction of red vs blue. Old vrs young. Left vs Right..etc etc

This seems to encourage a right vrs wrong arguments or a virtuous points scoring system. Deploying a dog whistle slogans is a tactic of either side of this

I view it as an effort to shut down the other side rather than hold dialogue and debate.

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago

It's hard to find common grounds between opposing views, but the least we can do is just accept that the other exists and each to their own. But these days we're past dialogue unfortunately. It's full on war, on all sides: religious, political, gender, race, class...

load more comments
view more: next ›