this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
378 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
4527 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

What's with the weird comma placement in the, title?

I know its not you, OP

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You mean the “, too”? That’s how it’s supposed to be written. People often don’t do it that way, but that’s how it’s correctly used, and few have accused us anglophones, as a whole, of really understanding how to use our own damn language. It’s the same with “, but”, also, and “, also”, also.

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm not sure they still teach the FANBOYS system - at least not as I learned it: a "use this, not that" prescription for tightening sentence structure.

A quick DuckDuckGo search suggests they are now, and perhaps always have been, used in conjunction with commas. Which, frankly, makes my skin crawl.

"She was tired, and she needed to eat."

"It was the best of times, and it was the worst of times."

Evil. Great Evil.

Perhaps I'm caviling against flabby sentences rather than flawed punctuation but I maintain that the construction reliably signals the former.

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm also an anglophone, but this seems not quite right to me. There's no real need to insert a comma in that sentence, as there's no real need to pause for clarity or pacing.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It’s not about need exactly, it’s about a writing convention. Also, we do have these pauses in our speech/that’s where we would insert those pauses naturally, they’re just often very subtle.

A lot of language, no matter what you speak, has a lot of these subtleties that are so engrained as to be almost unnoticeable. I’m at a pretty high intermediate level French and, because of the closeness with English, I’m actually learning quite a lot about why English is the way it is, too.