this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
819 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

82295 readers
4599 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Historically, the problem with Motorola hasn't been their os, it's been their hardware, it's just usually not very good when compared to the competition. And often the price is higher for what you're getting.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Big disagree here. Still offer a jack, SD card, etc. Worth way more to me than a high end processor that I don't use any more than a mid range one.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I grant that Motorola may neglect to go top of the line (e.g. there's no 'flagship grade' non-folding phone on offer right now), but price wise, at least in the US, it seems to be in line with other options and the cheaper options are generally motorola.

Is this US or elsewhere? What are the better value competition in the mid-lower range.