this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
406 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

46925 readers
758 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Not sure if this is worldwide or only in some countries)

Updating to iOS 26.4DB2 will put your phone into a parental-restricted mode with adult websites blocked on all browsers, warning prompts every time you try to send or receive an explicit image on a messaging app, and all social media apps blocked on the App Store (in Australia)

The settings to disable this mode are locked off until you verify your age either with a credit card, photo ID, or though information Apple already has (like the age of your account).

I've been an apple user my entire adult life but this might finally be the thing that forces me off the platform. Do any other long term apple users have some tips about migrating? I've heard Ashai Linux is pretty good on mac hardware these days and I've been thinking about GrapheneOS for a while.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 64bithero@lemmy.world 239 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I find it odd to protect children they will stalk the hell out of us but won’t arrest known pedophiles …

I hate the world

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 22 hours ago

Also they'll deny trans kids puberty blockers which are proven to be safe and reversible, and the alternative creates harm.

And they'll censor the internet for 'children' (a 17 year old is not a child) to prevent them finding community, support or education outside their IRL religious and harmful bubbles.

It was never about actually protecting children

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not to protect children though. It's for political surveillance.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Governments around the world, including the U.S., of course, have made it crystal clear through their actions that they don't give a fuck about protecting children.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Yeah apparently it's fine for them to fuck kids but too immoral to risk kids seeing people fucking.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better to just hate the whole Epstein Class. They trash the world for everyone else..

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We’ve had a name for them for the last 200 years: the capitalist class, or to be more precise, the haute bourgeoisie. The 1% of the 1%.

the haute bourgeoisie. The 1% of the 1%.

The painful irony being that the bourgeoisie were still below the nobles

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If everyone voting for these age requirements don't also vote to require you to use an ID to unlock the safety on a gun or remove a knife from the knife rack, they aren't voting on this to protect the children.

Knives and guns need age verification before someone seeing Kate Upton showing her breasts.

Im going side with none of it needs age verification, and all of it needs parental guidance

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

At least knives have a use outside of killing

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago