this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
161 points (81.3% liked)

Privacy

46947 readers
721 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Awesome...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

article in case you can't read it: ~~lemmy.ml/post/44086795~~ edit: better link in a reply.

proton coulda put up a fight, a loud one, for optics sake if nothing else. rolling over on any (and by implication, all) request should be the last straw in their long line of snafus; by way of "death by a thousand cuts", I would never entrust them with anything of importance.

signal demonstrated that you could decouple payment info from user data and a shop that touts the privacy part of their offerings coulda at least mimic such a thing.

edit 2: fuck any and all pay-with-crypto shills and the horse they rode in on.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You cannot put up a fight when ordered to do something by a judge who has jurisdiction over you. You either comply or you’re committing a crime.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine they got courts and lawyers and motions and hearings and stuff over there, even if the fight is doomed you need to show your teeth once in a while. and what's with the proton employee reviewing whether there were "explosives" and "guns" involved, naturally based on super-reliable evidence, what the fuck is that?!

and alla that aside, why do they have payment and user info on file, for what fucking purpose? there's either user privacy or there ain't. and them folks are in the "ain't" camp.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I imagine they got courts and lawyers and motions and hearings and stuff over there, even if the fight is doomed you need to show your teeth once in a while.

That’s not how it works. They can’t just refuse to comply with a lawful order from a judge. They could be put in actual jail. This affects all email providers.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

what is this take based on? there's a direct line between "we want this shit done" and "judge rubberstamps order"? no process, no interview, no hearing, no nothings? medieval courts maybe worked that way, no system of government I know of nowadays does.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Every single government works this way. Court orders are not optional.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

article in case you can’t read it: https://lemmy.ml/post/44086795

that link only has two paragraphs of the article; there are 8 more in the full article here on archive.org