this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
507 points (99.8% liked)

Memes of Production

1273 readers
1259 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Who did the Māori steal land from?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about modern times. Owned land is stolen land.

I don't know enough about Māori to say much about their land management practices prior to colonization. But I know Māori have nobility so it's entirely possible and perhaps likely that it was stolen from other Māori.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Good point. I think “all land is stolen land” is a good framework. As long as it doesn’t minimise colonisation obviously.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So after the British settled, some Māori went to a small island far to the east?

Doesn’t change the fact that they were the first people to arrive in NZ. Which was what I was getting at, but I will concede they did invade someone else’s land too.

..Kiwi birds? 🤷

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who ever was there before them.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No one was there before they arrived there 700 years ago.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ok. Finding an outlier as an example isn't impressive.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

I mean... if the claim is "all", it's not really an outlier. It's refuting the claim. An outlier is statistical; claiming "all" is either true or false. Not really interchangeable, without changing context

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

But providing the existence of a counter example is the foundational detraction to all-encompassing claims like "all land is stolen", in logic.