this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
770 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1345 readers
1320 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, but you need a down payment, and you need a bank to loan you the rest money for the house. The payment on that loan is half of rent, but that doesn't mean it's functionally accessible to most regular people.

Just an FYI for those in the US. If you're a first time homebuyer then there are loan programs available where you can pay as low as 0% down. The payments will be higher than if you made a 20% down payment of course but in my case they are still cheaper than rent would have been in my area. Basically they just tack on an extra monthly fee until you hit 20% equity but that fee isn't too horendous. In my case it adds about 7% to my total monthly mortgage payment. The whole 20% down thing is only really expected if you already own a home.

Loan accessibility and obcene home prices are still an issue of course. So while there are a lot of obsticles to buying a home, the down payment isn't nearly as big of one as many people think.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't you have banks that finance 100% of the price? Sure, they will charge higher interest, but if you're saving half the rent it won't be that bad...

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Banks don't give loans like that to people who aren't high earners already.

People could happily spend 50%+ of their income on their mortgage but banks will not give them those loans because they are seen as high risk, whereas people can rent at 50%+ of their income because there's less risk for the landlord (their only real risk is having to find a new tenant).

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Have you applied? I found banks very reasonable, like math based. Landlords go on feelings/profiling, in my experience and very often go on 35% rule.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes I've applied. I bought a place last year so it's very fresh. Banks being math-based is exactly the point. They won't bend the rules for you. Plus the expense is mostly set in stone once you buy, whereas with renting you can rent an affordable place and have it increase year-on-year every year following, taking it from within that 35% to above it.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that all in favor of buying?

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it's in favour of buying in the past. If you missed your window you're fucked though. That's why I bought, because I recognised the sliding window and knew if I didn't buy now I'd be locked out of buying forever and instead get stuck renting forever. I don't think anyone is against buying, just often unable to.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't see how those reasons (strict solvency checking, rules based decision making, etc) would lock anyone out.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Banks will not give you the loan if you do not make enough such that your repayments would be less than 35% of your income. But you could very well already be paying more than 35% of your income as rent. Trust me bro not everyone is renting because they feel like it. One of my friends saved a $100k deposit but didn't have the income to get a big enough loan for a house. These people aren't just stupid. Buying isn't an option for them.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The argument was that mortgage was half of rent. You won't be paying 70% rent...

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can be if you stay in the same place and the rent keeps increasing.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And my grandma had wheels she would be a bicycle

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the concept of someone staying in the same rental for a while and having their rent increase over time is that foreign to you then I don't think you should be commenting on this topic.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, rent doubling while income remains unchanged, not even inflation adjustment... is foreign to me.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Last year my job refused to give me an inflation adjustment, then they laid me off 6 months later because they didn't have as much growth as they projected.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You said it was foreign to you... So I provided an example of it happening...

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, for 6 months, for one person, without rent change, who might or might not be lying. So... cool anecdote, bruh.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It being foreign to you is literally an anecdote too you fucking idiot lmfaoooo

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

That's not the definition of anecdote, but hey, fun to see it got under your skin...