this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
494 points (98.8% liked)
Political Humor
1925 readers
280 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Exactly. As it stands, Congress' legal control of war exists in name only.
We've witnessed for decades now that a sitting president can absolutely wage war without congress' approval, just as long as they don't actually say the words "the US is at war with [country]".
I'd be surprised that congress has never attempted to go after the blatant loophole of "what if I just don't call it a war" - but I can't remember the last time that Congress successfully enforced it's control over anything.
Indeed.
I think what frustrates me most is that, even in the knowledge that Congress would authorize this war (and they absolutely would), they're still too lazy to even have a token vote on it.
That we're getting fucking reservists killed for this, and they won't even vote on it, just feels insulting to the people who expected to be training on weekends instead of getting bombed in a desert.