this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
549 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

5334 readers
218 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
549
The informed choice (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 2 days ago by cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DownByLaw@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I guess they mean the tweet of the Proton CEO, which was blown far out of proportion and without context and caused a sensationalist shitstorm on Reddit.

If you want a detailed write up: https://scribe.rip/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago

Dude basically just said that Reps were more responsive than Dems when he tried to lobby. Everyone's translation was that he must love Trump.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Good write up, thank you for the context.