this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8413 readers
329 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
21
The case for scrubbing the seas to save the climate | We can extract CO2 from the ocean. Can it turn into a business? (www.vox.com)
submitted 1 day ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

We already have countries where there are so many solar panels that the price of electricity goes negative on summer afternoons. Even if we build enough storage to carry that energy from afternoon to night, it's simply unfeasible to have enough storage to carry that energy from summer to winter.

So in the process of getting carbon-neutral in winter, we're going to have a massive amount of excess electricity in summer. We need some industry to spend all that free electicity, so why not carbon capture tech?

That's not a rhetorical question - any industry that is better than carbon capture tech will do - but right now the most likely claimants are terrible options like AI data centers or designing buildings to have less natural cooling and more air conditioning. And if we're going to use carbon capture tech at some point, better we have some small-scale experiments before that to work the kinks out.