this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
116 points (96.0% liked)

Climate

8413 readers
260 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is there a link to something that isn't a video?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 hours ago

https://actuaries.org.uk/media/isvotyer/parasol-lost.pdf

The first link in the description appears to be what the "parasol" in the title comes from.

It seems to be a partially AI-generated report by the University of Exeter, with the cover image being the most obvious marker. The "parasol" in the title doesn't seem to represent anything specific, so maybe that was AI-generated too, or maybe it was artisan hand-crafted clickbait.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The sources he uses are in the video description, if you'd prefer to read them.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All but one of the sources are from the same website. An internet search for the earth's parasol finds lots of proposed projects.

Does this Youtuber discuss real things? Do they have a good reputation?

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

About me, to contextualize my opinion (skippable): I'd rate myself as a moderate to highly informed consumer of new media. I'm quite critical of channels and judge their factual value and practices, and I have a pretty good grasp on who I watch primarily for entertainment (Vaush, LTT,...) and who I watch primarily for information and meaningful analysis (Belle of the Ranch, Gamers Nexus,...). I try not to let my opinion be swayed by online sentiment either; e.g. I'll heavily criticize channels for factual errors and what I can only call 'journalistic negligence' even when most people don't seem to have an issue with them (e.g. Matt Ferrell's Undecided)

I've watched Just Have A Think for a few years now and his videos tend to be pretty solid and draw from a good variety of sources. He does an okay job of separating his opinions form the facts and not sounding too authoritative when he's not quoting an authority. This is also helped by his style being informal and infotainment rather than news-like. The titles and thumbnails can be a little clickbaity at times but the substance is there. Many of his videos, including this one, just consist of him presenting and intellectualizing papers or reports from reputable or authoritative sources.

Overall, I'd say it's a channel worth listening to.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

I've been following them for a while. They have a solid reputation from what I know, and I think they do a good job of explaining recent climate studies in layman's terms.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I haven't watched this yet, but I'm familiar with his channel. He typically pulls in info from a few different sources (often studies, which he does cite) and talks about them. Pretty worthwhile.