this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)
Opensource
5722 readers
306 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116200110686604617
It's literally the same crap, just "under the new management".
The most toxic tech account after DHH. Good grief.
It doesn't really matter in the context of this particular topic. They've highlighted the problem and I think in here we should abstract from their personality and their conflicts with Murena & Co., and focus on the problem itself.
And the problem is that, regardless of who's implementing the attestation technology and regardless of who is critizing it, the very concept of device attestation based on OEM/Google/Apple/Murena/GrapheneOS/whoever approval is harmful and anti-consumer at its core.
No matter who owns the authority to decide which devices are deemed "good" and which are deemed "bad", this authority shouldn't exist at all. Only the user should be in charge of the decision of which os to use — be it Google's Android, GrapheneOS, MIUI, eOS, PostmarketOS or MS-DOS — OEMs/Google/Murena/etc should have no say in it.