this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
631 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82516 readers
4468 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 50 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

Whats up with these sudden age check laws being introduced everywhere?

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

The mainstream media want to destroy the competition.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

I know it's probably bad form to link to reddit posts here (but I'll use redlib to it's slightly less shitty lol) but there was actually a pretty interesting thread on r/Linux about this the other day. tl;dr: It looks like a lot of this is due to lobbying from Meta so they can shunt responsibility for age verification onto the OS and dodge fines for not regulating their sites properly.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 76 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Governments wanting to identify and regulate speech under the guise of protecting children

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The California law does not require age verification. Only attestation. From what I have heard the Colorado one is basically identical.

The NY one I have heard is more stringent. But I have not read that or the Colorado one.

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Still a 1st Amendment violation, no? Compelling speach

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

While I can't comment on any case law surrounding compelled speech. I don't thing that this would qualify as compelled speech.

Just based off a quick web search it seems that compelled speech is more about the government telling news organizations to report what they tell them.

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Forcing someone to disclose information about themselves (age or age bracket) is compelled speech

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago

It’s part of the tech bro mass surveillance oligarchs and Israel tightening the freedom of speech noose worldwide

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Hit everything at once, cause confusion and anger, distract from Epstein files and rising prices.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 9 points 22 hours ago

it's a checkmark on a politicians career without them having to do anything real

there's many issues politicians will rally under if they see that it's minimal work + huge virtue signaling potential (think of the children ! )

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Facebook is lobbying them so they don't have to do age checks on Instagram and can maximize the revenue

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Oh yeah why put age checks on a service when we could just put it on the whole freaking operating system?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 21 hours ago

Just a coincidence, don't worry about it!

[–] baka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 13 hours ago

Literally Israel