this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
885 points (98.5% liked)

Climate

8429 readers
676 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
885
Gas imports or solar panels? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/climate@slrpnk.net
170 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If it is true, then the implied cost would at least stand in for the 'manifest out of thin air', the cost is for making the panels exist.

Similarly, the LNG price is only about acquiring the fuel, not about the logistics of moving it around and managing it.

Though admittedly, the comparison is flawed in other ways..