Well, security isn't 100% the same as private, if you meant here as in this C/, rather than here as in this post. I tend to favor security over privacy, when only one is possible, but there is a small difference in how they apply to phones.

But, yeah, afaik, rooting a device decreases security. But if you can't/don't want to jump through hoops, not having it is also a decrease in entry level personal choice. But that's true of any android rom, not just graphene. It's just that graphene is explicitly against root because of the holes it can cause.

Again, on my end, root isn't currently high value. The things I would do with root access aren't worth the extra hassle and decrease in efficacy of graphene to do what it is intended to do.

Mind you, there are devices I would root if I weren't too lazy, for a small number of options. Just being able to easily use older apks is becoming a huge pain in the ass, and it's annoying enough that my irritation will eventually outweigh my laziness on a couple of devices, just not those I use for anything beyond playing games and writing fiction (where keyboard choice matters a lot on android, and my keyboard of choice is 32bit based, which you have to root for two of my devices to fix).

Anyway, tangents aside, I appreciate your extra detail :)