This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive
I just feel like it exemplifies a lot of our problems with the whole system. The rich declare the wars but don't fight them themselves. I'm not saying it wouldve been right if they did (see: Rome, medieval Europe), just that it is a good example of everything wrong with the system.
Although I'm coming to realize I don't particularly care for "morality." I'm not a vulgar materialist or ultra-leftist, i just feel like it's like arguing about whether it would be better for unstable atoms to do B+ or B- decay. You can't just say it ought to decay in one way or another, but that it'd be better if it did, and for it to do so you need to put it in certain circumstances. If that makes sense