this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
75 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

12781 readers
1233 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I appreciate the informative nature of their website but I would just use Debian and skip the impotent fuck you aimed at the corpos.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think it's a fuck you aimed at the attorney general and whoever phrased these laws. They go into detail in the FAQ at the bottom. (What is the point of all of this? / What if the AG actually fines you?) Using it isn't the really the point.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Now I am thinking...
If a kit in California were to make a YouTube video using this OS and AG ends up not fining anyone for it, can that be used as a precedent?

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 points 41 minutes ago

I think the way unclear / ambiguous law works is: It's almost always used against you. It's probably up to the attorney general to use it as precedent for what they want to do. Less so for the person at the receiving end of it.