this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
355 points (99.7% liked)

Memes of Production

1348 readers
997 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 49 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This is outright lying with statistics. The majority of traders on U.S. stock exchanges (95%+) are individual traders. They just use a clearing house that does the trading for them because it's cheaper and faster.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The majority of traders on U.S. stock exchanges (95%+) are individual traders.

Absolutely need a source for that one. Sounds wrong on both volume of $ and volume of trades.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's because "[number of] traders" and "volume" are two different numbers. Volume wise it's probably the opposite.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes but using number of traders is useless to look at which is why I used total volume or amount of trades both of which sounds wrong from Ops claim.

Number traders does sound accurate but it's a worthless metric that doesn't tell us anything because they aren't the ones doing the trading.

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I don't think, that was the point of the meme. It was just about making fun of tankies.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i thought it was making fun of US capitalism where socialism is used as an invective.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Nah it wasn’t it was making fun of the concept of “Marxist Leninist Stock Exchanges” implying that its just “state capitalism”.

Btw, happy cake day.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A mutual fund buys and sells on behalf of the consumer so individuals don't have voting rights.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also wrong. You can vote if you buy stocks themselves and not mutual funds.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Also wrong.

Only 21% of Americans directly own stock.

https://www.fool.com/research/how-many-americans-own-stock/?msockid=3cc1caf3010a68e612d9dc83002769e8

You can't say a statement is wrong by agreeing with it. You just said that they use clearing houses. The majority of stock ownership in the US is through mutual funds and other similar products where individuals cannot vote.

You can vote if you buy stocks themselves and not mutual funds.

I said people who buy mutual funds can't vote you muppet.

[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

By volume, right?

95% of volume is done by individual traders?

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is why I don't fuck with that. That and the memestock nonsense. I could tell you a high volume stock strike on Fridays by calculating how much corruption it took for market makers to not lose their ass. It's all rigged and disgusting. They'll drop a nuke on someone if their son in law can make a million.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

No it's the opposite