this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
505 points (99.4% liked)

World News

54790 readers
3991 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel did not have a realistic plan for regime change when it attacked Iran, multiple Israeli security sources have said, with expectations that airstrikes could lead to a popular uprising having been driven by “wishful thinking” rather than hard intelligence.

Iran has survived nearly two weeks of bombing raids and the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Trump is publicly contemplating ending the increasingly costly war.

If Iran’s new leadership keeps its grip on power, the long-term measure of the success of the conflict may hang on the fate of 440kg of enriched uranium which was buried under a mountain by US strikes last June, former and serving Israeli defence and intelligence sources said. Enough for more than 10 nuclear warheads, Iran could use it to hasten the construction of a weapon if the material remains in the country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a reason the Iranians didn't get their Internet privileges since January. If it wasn't as bad as the world thought you might not restrict information access so badly.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Where are the millions of Iranian refugees then? They're not caged prisoners like the Gazans are. You don't kill that many people in a short time and not have people trying to flee en mass. If it were true then Iran would be falling apart in a civil war.

Fuck off with these obvious lies. Blood thirsty fuckers.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

Because there is war there are millions of Iranian refugees.

News/information spread was suppressed and the Iranian regime routinely crushes protests violently. Hence I would guess the fallout was somewhat limited. Also the 40 day period is up. So protests would have likely reignited at the point of the invasion.

Just because facts don't fit your world view doesn't mean other people are bloodthirsty for saying that the Iranian regime had many thousands killed in the streets.