this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)

Engineering

972 readers
7 users here now

A place to geek out about engineering, fabrication, and design. All disciplines are welcome. Ask questions, share knowledge, show off projects you're proud of, and share interesting things you find.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. Generally stay on topic.
  3. No homework questions.
  4. No asking for advice on potentially dangerous jobs. Hire a professional. We don't want to be responsible when your deck collapses.

The community icon is ISO 7000-1641.

The current community banner image is from Lee Attwood on Unsplash.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still requires liquid nitrogen

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Well, we can't make that. Too bad. Sounded useful.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Using it. Those magnets depends on superconducting, which is only possible at low, really low temperatures (often close to absolute zero at 0K). Also the energy that generates the magnetic field also generates a lot of heat. So we cool those magnets with liquid nitrogen.

Also the problem isn't the liquid nitrogen but rather the liquid helium that is needed to reach the really low temperature ranges. Because helium is more scarce and expensive.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's described as "high-temperature superconducting" in the article, so "only" needs liquid nitrogen

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ah then I didn't read the method section long enough. I just read to the part where they describe they used helium to cool to 4 K. Thx for the correction!