this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
19 points (80.6% liked)

Ask Science

16046 readers
191 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The biggest problem IMO is the fact that all our power generation technology comes down to “boil water to turn turbine”. How we generate the heat changes, but not how we turn it into electricity.

Technically the ones that use steam to spin turbines are:

  • Coal plants
  • Gas plant
  • Thermal Solar Plants
  • Nuclear Fission Plants
  • Nuclear Fusion Plants

Then you have ones that spin turbines, but using other methods:

  • Hydro dams and tidal power - use water
  • Engines / Generators - use controlled explosions
  • Wind Turbines - use wind

Then you have the few that truly don't use spinning turbines:

  • Solar Panels - they use semi-conductors specially designed so that light causes the electrons in the material to start flowing, directly creating usable electricity.

  • Piezo Electrics - similar semiconductors that react to material stress (bending etc) and cause electrons to flow

  • Batteries & Fuel Cells - store power in chemical form, and the reactions cause the electrons to flow directly

  • (Proposed) Direct Energy Converters - experimental devices long proposed for nuclear fusion reactors that can directly produce flowing electrons. There's been recent research investigating doing this with fission reactors as well.

[–] NGram@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago

(Proposed) Direct Energy Converters

There's also another heat -> electricity conversion method used by nuclear fission reactors, though it could presumably be used for anything in place of a steam turbine: thermocouples. Usually people think of them as electrical sensors for heat, but they can also scale up to produce a lot of electricity from a lot of heat. It's not very new technology either; Voyager spacecrafts use it in their RTGs. No idea about how that scales though.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good expansion on other things that turn turbines, but all of which would also never work in a mobile suit. Solar and PZ are truly different than “spin turbine“ but neither would work great to power the suit. Batteries and fuel cells might someday be energy dense enough to run an iron man for a short time, but still a long ways off. I think the direct energy converters are a super long way off. Good for low power situations, but I doubt they’ll ever be powerfully enough to propel even cars.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh yeah, I was just expanding on the non turbine power types cause I think they're neat.

Though I missed some of the most interesting ones: Nuclear Batteries.

Edit: just realized that ngram already mentioned these.

They're different from chemical batteries in that they can't be charged or discharged, and their energy comes not from chemical reactions, but from radioactive decay.

Thermal-nuclear batteries convert heat into electricity, including completely solid state ones like radioisotope generators, that use an array of thermo-couples to convert heat into electricity, not turbines.

Then there are Beta-Voltaic nuclear batteries that use specialized semi-conductor circuits to convert the electrons and positrons emitted from a radioactive material into usable electricity.

Neither of these produce anywhere near enough power output for a flying suit, nor can their power output vary, but still interesting to think about in the context of Tony Stark's arc reactor.