Quark's

2075 readers

25 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ValueSubtracted@startrek.website

Admin@startrek.website

williams_482@startrek.website

'Buffy': Inside Story Of How High-Profile Reboot Was Shockingly Slayed (deadline.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website to c/quarks@startrek.website

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An interesting read that reflects on the state of decision-making in Hollywood at the moment.

The piece has the air of old ‘Kremlin-watching’ analyses in foreign affairs circles.

It’s truly bizarre that Geller and Zhao were given an official decision late on a Friday, just before launching major promotional events for other projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's honestly shocking that they pulled the plug on this one.

In her People interview, Gellar singled out one executive. “We had an executive on our show who was not only not a fan of the original, but was proud to constantly remind us that he had never seen the entirety of the series and how it wasn’t for him,” she said. “That’s very hard when you’re taking a property that is as beloved as Buffy, not just to the world, but to me and Chloé. So that tells you the uphill battle that we had been fighting since day one, when your executive is literally proud to tell you that he didn’t watch it.”

Gellar did not name the person; according to multiple sources, the executive Gellar was referring to is [Craig] Erwich.

This seems like a tale as old as time, though.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not approving this because despite the popularity at the time and the ongoing interest and income from streaming, DVD, and merch over the years, I personally didn’t enjoy the show

I’m not a fan of MBAs, but I think an MBA would be able to see the fallacy in this argument. This person shouldn’t be in a position of authority.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

The less corporations there are, the less executives there can be...

Nepotism will always take precedence, so the more a handful of corps control, the higher the percentage of executives are complete idiots.

Because all the new babies will always get a spot and preference on promotions.

Their percentage will always climb until critical mass where everyone is a nepo baby unqualified for even the easiest decisions.

They might have an MBA, but they got it into their school in the first place because of that nepotism. It doesn't mean they know anything about business. Doesn't trump have a business degree? Lots of idiots have MBAs