this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
123 points (96.2% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14426 readers
1760 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-19 SFA 1x07 "Ko’Zeine"
02-26 SFA 1x08 "The Life of the Stars"
03-05 SFA 1x09 "300th Night"
03-12 SFA 1x10 "Rubincon"
TBA SNW 4x01 TBA

Upcoming Trek

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Funny how we can influence a TV show into being canceled because it deals with "icky wokeness" but can't do anything about the actual icky child fucker.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Well, he wasn’t invited back for Home Alone 3.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What's crazy is I can't even pinpoint what they even mean by the wokeness? It's really not overbearing, nor anymore than SNW or other TV shows. Maybe I'm just in a West Coast echo chamber

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Academy is honestly less "woke" than Discovery, or even SNW.

Basically though, these jokers HATE the gay Klingon.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The ones who aren't being dishonest pieces of shit feeding into divisivism are usually complaining about the lack of quality of the writing and/or the overt nature of 'leftist' messaging. Meaning anything remotely progressive like gay people existing or touchy-feely things coming from guys in a manner where those things are not directly relevant to the plot or don't actually change anything end up feeling forced, and thusly feel like they're sprinkled in just to "be progressive".

Often times there is some credibility to the complaints of the quality of writing, it's just the 'woke' thing that triggered them to think about why the thing on screen is happening. Instead of noticing that it's a general ham-fisted nature to the writing (which Trek basically always has in quite a few episodes of all series), they stupidly blame 'woke'.

That is the power of the brainwashing coming from the dishonest propagandists like Ben Shapiro and their ilk: Legitimate shortcomings become things caused by "the other", instead of basic variability of quality.

IMO, the bigger problem with Trek is Hollywood dumbasses like Kurtzman like pushing messaging more than writing good stories to challenge the alternate POV, which plays right into the shitty propagandists' hands.

There are plenty of old episodes that would embarass modern Trek with being progressive since they didn't make it an overt declaration (tell the audience), but showed why the bigoted view was bad. Whereas new Trek loves to just... declare the progressive view as good, and then go on to Main Character the problem away: Poor writing even when you agree with the message.

Sure, there are also quite a few hamfisted episodes of old Trek, but I'd much rather take 24 episode seasons smattered with ham than 10 episodes with an overarching story that loves to simply declare itself superior. It's so much easier to ignore the poorly written episodes in old Trek when there is so much to take in, especially when there are some gems to find.

IMO, the overproduction is also hurting a lot of newer IPs even beyond being a huge cost. It sets the expectations higher. It's so much easier to gloss over a 6/10 in writing which is inevitable in a long running series no matter the message, when the visuals and the rest aren't a 10/10 in every scene. If the episodes weren't insanely expensive, long productions, they'd be able to put out a lot more episodes to drown out the bad ones. Instead, they give us 10, in a season that's almost always a bit rocky to begin with in every series.

I think setting expectation is one reason why Lower Decks gets so much love. It's "just a cartoon", so when the writing nails a mature topic, it feels like a proper treat.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Whereas new Trek loves to just… declare the progressive view as good

can you cite example, not saying you're wrong, but I always feel modern trek does representation without any clear messaging/opinion at all. Its a case of we "have these things" but fear actually using the things in a morality play. I'd be happier with modern trek if it actually took a proper side

[–] pEg@startrek.website 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There are plenty of old episodes that would embarass modern Trek with being progressive since they didn’t make it an overt declaration (tell the audience), but showed why the bigoted view was bad. Whereas new Trek loves to just… declare the progressive view as good

Are you for real?

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 0 points 8 hours ago

Yes. I also said there was plenty of silly things.

Two things can be true at once. Especially when there are far more episodes of previous Trek, and not only TOS.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The reason people like lower deck so much is because it was obviously written by an actual Star Trek fan rather than someone trying to write generic science fiction and then slap a Star Trek aesthetic on top. Which was what discovery was like in the early days.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Fully agreed there! They also do mature topics better than many humor focused cartoons. At least more regularly.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree that cartoons set lower expectations. I expected a lot from Lower Decks and that expectation was well satisfied. One thing LDS does benefit from is the 22 minute runtime. 45 minute episodes are too long.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago

Cartoons don't set lower expectations. They naturally come with a different set of expectations that happens to have more leeway with writing. Especially in comedies vs overproduced "serious" shows.

[–] Zaraki42@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

If anything, Discovery was way more "woke".

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I mean, it ain't exactly The Honeymooners or Dukes of Hazzard, is it? That's the standard that we're measuring "woke" against these days!