this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
120 points (97.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47340 readers
957 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've only absorbed bits and pieces of the story, but allegedly there's an age verification push happening on Linux? What's the full story here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bilouba@jlai.lu 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They added a field and everyone is losing their minds because systemd has already a bad reputation for doing too much and being too powerful and also because everyone hate age verification so they don't want it in their free OS so it crystalize the hate. There was something about AI too if I recall. I don't want US law to impact international FOSS and I don't want any kind of identity or age verification inside my OS so I understand and share the rage. But this change was very much not a big or impactful thing. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm 70% confident on the issue.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The issue is that some idiot suddenly appeared on the systemd repo to immediately push a change that adds the posibility of logging the user's age into systemd. The community complained and explained that nobody wanted that change, and yet this idiot pushed through, ignored the feedback, and ended up getting the pull request merged. Not only that, but the discussion thread was locked to prevent criticism, and the merge was done by Microsoft employees. After the merge, someone tried to undo the change, and the effort was blocked by a Microsoft employee.

Despite the excuses, Systemd is not an OS, and it doesn't even need to comply with any age verification laws. The fact that someone went and implemented a deeply unpopular change into a system that shouldn't even deal with that info and that is used by most Linux distros, just to aid a surveillance government in implementing better surveillance on the entire world's users is what lead to the pushback.

Additionally, Lennart Poettering used Claude to review the pull request, and has been using it for developing SystemD. I'm not gonna go too deep into that, but trust me, it's really bad.

Double additionally, Lennart Poettering also defended not properly securing this sensitive data, because that would be too bothersome for him.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] black0ut@pawb.social 5 points 5 days ago

He quit because of optics (understandably, Linux people didn't like a Microsoft employee making software that was in almost every distro), but he still works with Microsoft and other Microsoft employees

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

thats cool until you find out the reason for that is he founded a company that's goal is to turn desktop into locked down android.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah... Didnt know..

I guess I stop using systemd or what now

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The AI was the slopfork written by one of the hyperventilating redditors.

You pretty right except the California law that the systemd change was in response to doesn't do verification it just returns whatever age bracket is stored.