this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
647 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

15386 readers
551 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is huge

The right-wing candidate who said "stop the war on cars" was defeated.

The leftist who said "My goal is to make sure Grégoire loses" was defeated

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would have upvoted you til you used an ableist slur. You could have made your argument perfectly well - in fact, even stronger - if you chose a specific word that more closely matches the problem. It isn't that they're intellectually disabled, it's because they are too blinded by ideology to take a pragmatic approach. I'd just say "...the others aren't pragmatic enough to put aside their differences" or something.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. This has nothing to do with pragmatism. This is the fucking ruling class shitting their pants because they fear the loss of their privileges. The PS is nothing more than cockroaches trying everything to keep the little bit of power they have.

Do you imagine if you had to find a proper job after being an elected PS official for years? What would you out in your CV? Traitor (Faure)? CIA asset (Glucksman)? "I successfully lead a party to its ruin (Holland, Valls)?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right, okay, that's fine -- my point is that the problem isn't intellectual disability, and even if it was, you shouldn't use the r-slur. I am disabled and I have had that word weaponized against me my entire life, and seeing it used brings back memories of all of the times I was bullied and harassed for being different.

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Sorry that happened to you buddy ♥️

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can understand this. If it clears things up in my world retarded! = disabled.

In my head, retarded is someone who's purposefully going out if his way to be as stupid as possible. Just like dude or bro is genderless. Idk if this makes sense for you, tho.

I'm sorry if you felt attacked. This was not the goal.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

If it clears things up in my world retarded! = disabled.

I get what you're saying, but unfortunately we don't live in your world, we live in the real world, where the term "mental retardation" was historically used to refer to intellectual disability, and has since been weaponized against disabled people and is used as a negative slur all the time.

I understand that you used it without harmful intent, but what I am trying to express to you is that it doesn't matter what your intent was, much like the n-word, the word has baggage and causes real world harm, and further marginalizes some of the most marginalized people in society.

Please, have some compassion, just choose to use some other word or turn of phrase instead, is it really that hard?