this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
748 points (87.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2990 readers
873 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The US is built around a party system (and typically a 2 party system). Like it or not, that's what it is. No amount of crying on the internet is going to change that.

So either burn shit in the streets, or work within the system. Bitching about it while not voting as a "protest" just puts the absolute worst shit hawks in power.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's a two party system, but every so often an old rotten party gets torn down and replaced with a new one.

[–] xxam925@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

The former appeals. Need critical mass though so set the engines to warp 10.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.

  • Julius Nyerere

burn shit in the streets is your best option.
But knowing how potty trained to "work within the system" you all are and there is zero chance for you pacified slaves.
Resign in your fate and get what you deserve

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Not from the banana republic.
We do and did it when necessary

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

voting is what puts politicians in power.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Obviously, the only way to end FPTP while working within the system is to vote for people who are against FPTP.

If they don't oppose FPTP, then they are fine with Republicans and are playing you for a fool. Yes they know, everyone has known since the 2000 election.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FPTP is not the problem, that works well for presidentials, which is what everyone cares. The problem is with Winner Takes All and electoral college, which means your vote is worth very little in all but swing states.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FPTP doesn't work well at all for presidential elections. FPTP is infamously why George W. Bush became president. It's why we have a "two" party duopoly who want to keep it that way.

No objection to proportional representation, but that's a little further out than "can we vote for people who are actually good". It's a much tougher sell.

Same with the electoral college - sure it sucks, but that's not why otherwise good people vote for genocide.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FPTP doesn't work well at all for presidential elections. FPTP is infamously why George W. Bush became president.

Al Gore won the popular vote in the 2000 presidentials, which in a true FPTP, would have netted him the POTUS.

Trump also lost the popular vote, but Clinton got really screwed by the Electoral College. Would life (in the US) have been better if Al Gore and Hillary Clinton had been made presidents instead of Bush and Trump (notably two of the worst presidents)?

Maybe. But the fact is that under a purely FPTP presidentials, Bush would not have won.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No offense, but were you an adult by 2000? The popular vote wasn't done counting until after the Supreme Court ruled in Bush's favor. Had there been no spoiler effect, it wouldn't have been close, and the Supreme Court wouldn't have ruled on it.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I am not American and I just read the wiki page over....